Inclusion body myositis



Author: Professor Patrick Chérin
Scientific editor: Professor Jon Andoni Urtizberea

Date de creation: April 2000
Last up-date: March 2003



Introduction
We can distinguish, within primary myositis(or inflammatory myopathies) three main groups, defined according to clinical and immunohistochemical aspects:  dermatomyositis (DM, often acute), polymyositis(PM, often chronic) and inclusion body myositis (IBM).  Although these three entities exhibit marked clinical and biological polymorphisms, they have in common immune dysfunctions with inflammatory involvement of striated muscles.  Their etiologies, still poorly elucidated, associate environmental and genetic factors.  Nonetheless, considerable progress in our understanding and management of these diseases has been made in the past few years.

Epidemiology
Sporadic IBM most frequently affect men (M/F ratio: 3/1), usually adults over 50 years old.  Sporadic IBM represent, depending on the series, 15–30% of all idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Sporadic IBM must be differentiated from familial (non inflammatory) inclusion body myopathie.

Clinical manifestations
The motor defect of IBM is myogenic, predominantly affecting proximal muscles, notably the shoulder and especially pelvic girdles, and cervical muscles.  Certain clinical manifestations can orient the diagnosis towards this myopathy.  The clinical picture typically associates bilateral muscle deficits and atrophy of insidious or progressive onset, often asymmetrical, proximal and distal deficits from the start, but generally late distal deficit during the course of PM and DM.  The asymmetrical nature of the distribution and selective involvement of certain muscles are sometimes suggestive of the diagnosis:  anterior tibial and quadriceps in the legs; flexors of the wrist and fingers; palmar, biceps and triceps in the arms.  Myalgias and dysphagia are seen in 15–20% of the patients.  Visceral manifestations, other than deglutition pneumopathies caused by pharyngeolaryngeal muscle involvement and rare cardiomyopathies , seem to be unusual.

Complementary examinations
Muscle enzymes, especially creatine phosphokinase (CPK), are normal or, more frequently, moderately elevated.  An inflammatory syndrome is usually (70%) absent or moderate.  No specific manifestations of immune dysfunction have been identified.  Electromyography tracings show myogenic or, more rarely, mixed patterns attesting to an associated neurogenic process.  Nerve conduction velocities are normal.

Histology and immunohistochemistry
The diagnosis is based on light microscopy of muscle biopsies, which detects rimmed vacuoles, 3–30 microns in diameter, within normal or atrophic muscle fibers.  These rimmed vacuoles contain eosinophilic granules and are located in the cytoplasm of muscle cells.  Inflammatory infiltrates, comprised mainly of macrophages and CD8+ T lymphocytes, are associated only in the sporadic forms and predominantly invade the endomysium and perivascular regions of non-necrotic muscle fibers.  Other anomalies are also present:  muscle fibers of abnormal size with hypertrophic fibers and increased numbers of muscle capillaries.  Unlike PM and DM, necrotic and regenerating foci are rarely seen in IBM.  These anomalies might not be found in routine histological examination.  New sections must be cut or a new biopsy taken.  Electron microscopy can detect inside these vacuoles tubulofilamentous structures, 15–20 nm in diameter, rectilinear, curvilinear and corresponding to eosinophilic granulations.  These intracytoplasmic and/or intranuclear filamentous inclusions are sufficient to confirm the diagnosis.
 Immunohistochemical labeling of the mononuclear cells forming the inflammatory infiltrates shows them to be mainly macrophages and CD8+ T lymphocytes, attesting to a predominantly cell-mediated immune reaction.  Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) HLA class I antigens are also abnormally expressed on the sarcolemma of non-necrotic infiltrated muscle fibers.  This possible cytotoxic T-cell origin restricted to MHC class I makes IBM more reminiscent of chronic PM.  These immunological abnormalities tend to favor an immune dysfunction but do not prove the autoimmune nature of IBM.
 Immunohistochemistry is able to specify the possible composition of cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions.  The contents of rimmed vacuoles exhibit positive yellow–green birefringence, characteristic of deposits of beta-folded amyloid proteins, notably beta-amyloid (or A4 protein).  These deposits are not always strictly intracellular, but also found adjacent to the sarcolemma or even outside the muscle fiber.  Amyloid is usually deposited in the extracellular spaces after abnormal enzymatic cleavage from its precursor, a transmembrane protein, which releases A4 protein.  Beta-amyloid and the protein precursor accumulate in the vacuolated fibers, under the sarcolemma or outside the fiber in the form of amorphous, flocular beads.  In addition, ubiquitin, a physiological protein involved in transport and regulation of proteolysis, is abnormally present in muscles of IBM patients.  Ubiquitin assures the transport of abnormal cell proteins, notably filamentous cytoskeletal proteins, towards the ATPase-dependent proteolytic lysosome system, which degrades them.  This protein is abnormally abundant in cytoplasmic vacuoles, in the amorphous flocular substance and monocyte nuclei.  An anomaly of cellular proteolysis, notably of ubiquitin, could induce amyloidogenesis and an immune reaction.  Cytoplasmic inclusions could also correspond to deposits of a protein associated with microtubules, which constitute, along with actin and intermediary filaments, the protein network of the cytoskeleton of eukaryote cells.  The microtubules are composed of tubulin and microtubule-associated proteins (MAP).  The inclusions could correspond to a MAP, either its normally phosphorylated form, the protein tau, or its abnormally phosphorylated form, the ALZ 50 protein.  Other proteins, precursors or not of beta-amyloid, notably apolipoprotein E, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin and the prion protein, have been found in excess in muscle cells of IBM patients, making this disease reminiscent of Alzheimer’s disease.

Prognosis
Spontaneously, IBM generally worsens progressively and slowly.  Some observations of stabilizations and remissions, spontaneous or under treatment, have been reported, but are usually only transient.

Treatment
At present, no treatment has been shown to be effective against the different forms of IBM, be it corticosteroids, plasma exchanges, immunosuppressants or total body irradiation.  Some moderate success has sometimes been obtained with the combination of corticosteroids and methotrexate or human intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg).  New therapeutic protocols are currently being tested.  Symptomatic treatments – prevention of inhalation pneumopathies, physical therapy, ergotherapy – are systematically prescribed.

Key-words
Inclusion body myositis, inflammatory myopathy, motor deficiency, muscle biopsy, immunomodulating agents, rimmed vacuoles

References



This paper should be referenced as such :
Chérin P. Inclusion body myositis. Orphanet encyclopedia, March 2003:
http://www.orpha.net/data/patho/GB/uk-IBM.html


Address for correspondence
Prof Patrick Chérin, MD, PhD
President of GERMMAD (Groupe d’Étude et de Recherche sur les Maladies Musculaires Acquises et Dysimmunitaires),
an arm of the Association Française des Myopathies
Service de Médecine Interne I (Pr Herson)
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié–Salpêtrière
47, bd de l’Hôpital
75651 Paris Cedex 13, France